Ingliz tilini o‘qitish jarayonida qayta aloqa kompetensiyasini rivojlantirishda generativ sun’iy intellektdan foydalanishning pedagogik imkoniyatlari
Боковая панель статьи
Основное содержимое статьи
Аннотация
Zamonaviy ta’lim tilshunosligida qayta aloqa o‘qituvchining tuzatuvchi izohi emas, balki o‘quvchining uni anglash, baholash va amalda qo‘llash faoliyati bilan bog‘liq murakkab jarayon sifatida talqin etiladi. Mazkur maqolada “qayta aloqa kompetensiyasi” tushunchasi ingliz tilini chet tili sifatida o‘qitish nuqtayi nazaridan yoritilib, u o‘quvchining qayta aloqani maqsadli so‘rashi, tushunishi, verifikatsiya qilishi, baholashi, amalda qo‘llashi va keyingi vazifalarga transfer qila olishini ifodalovchi integrativ qobiliyat sifatida asoslanadi. Generativ sun’iy intellekt vositalarining keng tarqalishi ushbu kompetensiyaning ahamiyatini yanada oshirmoqda. Zamonaviy tadqiqotlarni konseptual umumlashtirish asosida qayta aloqani maqsadli so‘rash, tushunish, verifikatsiya qilish, evaluativ hukm chiqarish, qayta ishlash hamda refleksiv transferdan iborat olti komponentli model taklif etiladi. Shuningdek, inson va sun’iy intellekt hamkorligiga asoslangan qayta aloqa siklining O‘zbekiston EFL amaliyotidagi pedagogik imkoniyatlari va cheklovlari yoritiladi.
Информация о статье
Библиографические ссылки
Abdullaev D., Abdazimov A., Khusainova Z., Makhmudov S., Sagdullaeva D. A phenomenological study on the impact of personalized AI feedback on writing quality: Insights from EFL students in Uzbekistan // Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal. – 2025. – Vol. 26, No. 7. – P. 162–186.
Alnemrat A., Aldamen H., Almashour M., Al-Deaibes M., AlSharefeen R. AI vs. teacher feedback on EFL argumentative writing: A quantitative study // Frontiers in Education. – 2025. – Vol. 10. – Art. 1614673.
Carless D., Boud D. The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback // Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. – 2018. – Vol. 43, No. 8. – P. 1315–1325.
Escalante J., Pack A., Barrett A. AI-generated feedback on writing: Insights into efficacy and ENL student preference // International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. – 2023. – Vol. 20. – Art. 57.
Hawkins B., Taylor-Griffiths D., Lodge J. M. Summarise, elaborate, try again: Exploring the effect of feedback literacy on AI-enhanced essay writing // Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. – 2026. – Vol. 51, No. 5. – P. 879–891. – DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2025.2492070.
Jin F. J.-Y., Maheshi B., Lai W., Li Y., Gasevic D., Chen G., Charwat N., Chan P. W. K., Martinez-Maldonado R., Gašević D., Tsai Y.-S. Students’ perceptions of generative AI-powered learning analytics in the feedback process: A feedback literacy perspective // Journal of Learning Analytics. – 2025. – Vol. 12, No. 1. – P. 152–168.
Liu K., Deris F. D. AI feedback literacy in higher education: Understanding, measuring, and predicting student feedback uptake // Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. – 2025. – Advance online publication.
Mekheimer M. Generative AI-assisted feedback and EFL writing: A study on proficiency, revision frequency and writing quality // Discover Education. – 2025. – Vol. 4. – Art. 170.
Mirzayev A. B., Abdullah Kamal S. S. L., Axundjanova M. A. Understanding Uzbekistan university EFL teachers’ perceptions of ChatGPT: From benefits to ethical challenges // International Journal of Information and Education Technology. – 2025. – Vol. 15, No. 2. – P. 246–254.
Molloy E., Boud D., Henderson M. Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy // Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. – 2020. – Vol. 45, No. 4. – P. 527–540.
Qian Y. Pedagogical applications of generative AI in higher education: A systematic review of the field // TechTrends. – 2025. – Vol. 69. – P. 1105–1120.
Song C., Song Y. Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students // Frontiers in Psychology. – 2023.
Tam A. C. F. Interacting with ChatGPT for internal feedback and factors affecting feedback quality // Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. – 2025. – Vol. 50, No. 2. – P. 219–235.
Yan D., Zhang S. L2 writer engagement with automated written corrective feedback provided by ChatGPT: A mixed-method multiple case study // Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. – 2024. – Vol. 11. – Art. 1086.
Zhan Y., Yan Z. Students’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback: Implications for student feedback literacy in the context of generative artificial intelligence // Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. – 2026. – Vol. 51, No. 5. – P. 821–834.
Zou S., Guo K., Wang J., Liu Y. Investigating students’ uptake of teacher- and ChatGPT-generated feedback in EFL writing: A comparison study // Computer Assisted Language Learning. – 2026. – Vol. 39, No. 4. – P. 1062–1091.