Robototexnika asoslari fanida Arduino platformasi asosida amaliy mashg‘ulotlarni tashkil etish: tizimli adabiyotlar sharhi
Боковая панель статьи
Основное содержимое статьи
Аннотация
So‘nggi yillarda robototexnika, sun’iy intellekt va avtomatlashtirish texnologiyalarining jadal rivojlanishi muhandislik ta’limining mazmunini yangilash zaruratini yuzaga keltirdi. Zamonaviy ishlab chiqarish korxonalari nazariy bilim bilan cheklanmaydigan, balki elektron qurilmalarni loyihalash, dasturlash va boshqarish ko‘nikmalariga ega mutaxassislarni talab qilmoqda. Shu nuqtai nazardan, oliy ta’lim muassasalarida "Robototexnika asoslari" fanini amaliy yo‘naltirilgan holda o‘qitish dolzarb masalalardan biri hisoblanadi. Arduino platformasi ochiq apparat va dasturiy ta’minotga ega bo‘lgan, iqtisodiy jihatdan arzon hamda foydalanish qulayligi bilan ajralib turadigan mikrokontroller platformasi sifatida robototexnika ta’limida keng qo‘llanilmoqda. Mazkur maqolada Arduino platformasi asosida robototexnika fanida amaliy mashg‘ulotlarni tashkil etish bo‘yicha chop etilgan ilmiy tadqiqotlar tizimli ravishda tahlil qilindi. Tadqiqot davomida Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect va SpringerLink bazalarida indekslangan ilmiy maqolalar o‘rganildi. Adabiyotlar tahlili Arduino platformasi loyiha asosida o‘qitish, STEAM yondashuvi va muammoli ta’lim metodlari bilan uyg‘unlashtirilganda talabalar kompetensiyalarini rivojlantirishda yuqori samaradorlikka ega ekanligini ko‘rsatdi. Xususan, algoritmik tafakkur, dasturlash ko‘nikmalari, elektron sxemalarni loyihalash, muammolarni hal qilish va jamoada ishlash kompetensiyalarining shakllanishiga ijobiy ta’sir ko‘rsatishi aniqlandi.
Информация о статье
Библиографические ссылки
M.El-Abd, “A Review of Embedded Systems Education in the Arduino Age: Lessons Learned and Future Directions,” International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 79–93, 2017.
F.V.Benitti, “Exploring the Educational Potential of Robotics in Schools: A Systematic Review,” Computers & Education, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 978–988, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006.
A.Eguchi, “Educational Robotics for Promoting 21st Century Skills,” Journal of Automation, Mobile Robotics & Intelligent Systems, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 5–11, 2014.
D.Alimisis, “Educational Robotics: Open Questions and New Challenges,” Themes in Science and Technology Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 63–71, 2013.
P.A.García-Tudela and J.-A. Marín-Marín, "Use of Arduino in Primary Education: A Systematic Review," Education Sciences, vol. 13, no. 2, Art. no. 134, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13020134.
J.A.Marín-Marín, P.A.García-Tudela, and P. Duo-Terrón, "Computational thinking and programming with Arduino in education: A systematic review for secondary education," Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 8, Art. no. e29177, 2024.
G.Kandlhofer and M.Steinbauer, “Evaluating the Impact of Educational Robotics on Pupils’ Technical- and Social-Skills and Science Related Attitudes,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 75, pp. 679–685, 2016.
D.Khairy, R.A.Abougalala, M. F. Areed, S. M. Atawy, S. Alkhalaf, and M. A. Amasha, "Educational Robotics Based on Artificial Intelligence and Context-Awareness Technology: A Framework," Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, vol. 98, no. 13, pp. 2227–2241, Jul. 2020.
T.R.Kelley and J.G.Knowles, “A Conceptual Framework for Integrated STEM Education,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 3, no. 11, 2016.
M.Prince, “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223–231, 2004.
J. Larmer, J. Mergendoller, and S. Boss, Setting the Standard for Project Based Learning. Alexandria, VA, USA: ASCD, 2015.
J.W.Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications, 2018.
D.Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D. G. Altman, “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 6, no. 7, e1000097, 2009.